The NRL transfer saga surrounding Zac Lomax has taken a dramatic turn, leaving fans and pundits alike on the edge of their seats. But here's where it gets controversial... While the Melbourne Storm has openly pursued Lomax, they’re not the only club eyeing the talented winger. And this is the part most people miss: Parramatta Eels hold all the cards, demanding a juicy compensation that could reshape the league’s landscape.
The Storm’s interest in Lomax sparked backlash at a recent NRL chief executives’ conference, with rival clubs questioning the move. Yet, Hall of Fame halfback Cooper Cronk predicts other teams will soon join the fray. Lomax’s early release from the Eels, initially aimed at joining R360, hit a snag when the league delayed its launch. Now, Parramatta has set clear conditions: Lomax can’t play for another NRL team until 2029 unless the Eels approve—and that approval comes with a price.
According to the Sydney Morning Herald, the Eels have shortlisted three Storm players they’d consider in exchange: Xavier Coates, Stefano Utoikamanu, or Jack Howarth. Here’s the catch: Coates and Howarth are both outside backs, meaning the Storm wouldn’t gain depth in that area by trading either. Meanwhile, Craig Bellamy and Melbourne’s leadership are eager to bolster their backline, especially with Will Warbrick sidelined due to concussion issues.
The timing adds another layer of complexity. Coates, Howarth, and Utoikamanu are off-contract at the end of 2027, making them prime targets for rivals starting November 1. Yet, it’s unlikely the Storm will part with any of this trio, given their roster challenges. Eels CEO Jim Sarantinos has been crystal clear: Lomax won’t join the Storm—or any other club—without an appropriate exchange of value.
But is this demand fair, or are the Eels overplaying their hand? Cronk argues that while Melbourne has a right to pursue Lomax, the Eels hold the power. “If they get some juicy compensation, by all means,” Cronk said on the Kayo Sports NRL Podcast. “But if it’s not juicy enough, hold onto Lomax.” He believes other clubs will knock on Parramatta’s door, but the Eels won’t budge unless the deal benefits them significantly.
The debate doesn’t end there. Michael Ennis questioned the Storm’s need for Lomax, pointing out their existing backline strength with players like Sua Fa’alogo, Coates, and Warbrick. “Where would they even play him?” Ennis asked. Braith Anasta suggested Lomax could slot into centre, but this raises further questions about the Storm’s roster strategy.
So, what do you think? Are the Eels justified in their demands, or are they holding Lomax hostage for too high a price? And is the Storm’s pursuit of Lomax a smart move, or are they overlooking their current talent? Let us know in the comments—this story is far from over.
